Reasoning on social networks

If I:
-came to a page with critical thinking and skepticism in its name.
-made a positive claim.
-refused to provide evidence, but admonished others to do so.
-was provided disconforming evidence.
-changed the subject rather than address the evidence.
-made fallacious claims and arguments.
-played the victim.
-compared the admin to their anathematic opposite.
-bailed on the post while blaming the page for the outcome.
That would be my fault, and my failure.