Cosmosophy

vendredi 12 avril 2019

Hi,
I read your excellent and instructive review on human face transformation. I was surprised by your assertion at the end of the paper:
"In addition, some projections of global warming suggest humans could soon be living on a planet that is 4 °C warmer than today, with a somewhat different atmospheric composition, which would certainly affect human physiology. "
In the literature (IPCC) the risk of such an increase is <1 .6="" 5="" a="" an="" br="" error="" fair="" hypothesis="" improbable="" is="" it="" limit="" null="" of="" out="" point="" put="" reject="" research="" risk="" scientific="" so="" such="" the="" to="" when="">

TY for your answer,
regards,

Dear G...
The information derived from NASA: https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/

Specifically, it is stated that: Scientists have high confidence that global temperatures will continue to rise for decades to come, largely due to greenhouse gases produced by human activities. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which includes more than 1,300 scientists from the United States and other countries, forecasts a temperature rise of 2.5 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit over the next century.

We only said this:

In addition, some projections of global warming suggest humans could soon be living on a planet that is 4 °C warmer than today, with a somewhat different atmospheric composition, which would certainly affect human physiology.

Therefore a change of 4 °C is within IPCC estimations

Best wishes;

https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/ar4_wg1_full_report-1.pdf

https://www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm

https://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/7.45015.1498666321!/suppinfoFile/546593a-s1.pdf

http://sciencenordic.com/scientists-three-years-left-reverse-greenhouse-gas-emission-trends

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

http://sciencenordic.com/what-will-our-climate-look-2050

http://sciencenordic.com/scientists-three-years-left-reverse-greenhouse-gas-emission-trends

https://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/1.22201!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/546593a.pdf

jeudi 11 avril 2019

Indispensable Raymond Aron

«L’intellectuel français est séparé des réalités économiques et sociales, qu’il connaît mal, il a la nostalgie de l’universalisme, de l’universalité. Il est insatisfait d’une petite France, il est de tradition de gauche. Il vit dans un pays catholique, et les pays catholiques sont probablement plus exposés à l’universalisme communiste que les pays protestants. Il rêve d’une solution totale des problèmes sociaux. Et puis il y a un élément de conformisme. Il est plus facile de se dire de gauche que de refuser de l’être.»
Raymond ARON, ORTF, 1982.