vendredi 23 mai 2014

My first advice: walk barefoot or with "barefoot" shoes


Before any running trial with five fingers or any other minimalist shoes walk with them during 3 months and walk barefoot at home!
Then run barefoot on the wet sand at the beach no more than once a week for instance.
If you experience no pain especially at the balls level or in your Achilles' tendon you can begin to alternate minimalist running shoes and cushioned ones to run your workouts.
Avoid road or concrete surfaces with minimalist shoes!

Just do it

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/04/13/education/edlife/edlife-quiz-psych.html?_r=0

French Socialists decided by law that races disappeared or never existed: it is just a religious belief far from science

http://jaymans.wordpress.com/jaymans-race-inheritance-and-iq-f-a-q-f-r-b/



http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/primate-diaries/2014/05/21/on-the-origin-of-white-power/

This french law is completely wrong.
It is simple to follow the news flow in this field. And N Wade is just in time.

http://www.amazon.com/Troublesome-Inheritance-Genes-Human-History/dp/1594204462


A very interesting comment on Amazon.

And don't forget the genes
 A. Jogalekar  
"In this book Nicholas Wade advances two simple premises: firstly, that we should stop looking only toward culture as a determinant of differences between populations and individuals, and secondly, that those who claim that any biological basis for race is fiction are ignoring increasingly important findings from modern genetics and science. The guiding thread throughout the book is that "human evolution is recent, copious and regional" and that this has led to the genesis of distinct differences and classifications between human groups. What we do with this evidence should always be up for social debate, but the evidence itself cannot be ignored.

That is basically the gist of the book. It's worth noting at the outset that at no point does Wade downplay the effects of culture and environment in dictating social, cognitive or behavioral differences - in fact he mentions culture as an important factor at least ten times by my count - but all he is saying is that, based on a variety of scientific studies enabled by the explosive recent growth of genomics and sequencing, we need to now recognize a strong genetic component to these differences.

The book can be roughly divided into three parts. The first part details the many horrific and unseemly uses that the concept of race has been put to by loathsome racists and elitists ranging from Social Darwinists to National Socialists. Wade reminds us that while these perpetrators had a fundamentally misguided, crackpot definition of race, that does not mean race does not exist in a modern incarnation. This part also clearly serves to delineate the difference between a scientific fact and what we as human beings decide to do with it, and it tells us that an idea should not be taboo just because murderous tyrants might have warped its definition and used it to enslave and decimate their fellow humans.

The second part of the book is really the meat of the story and Wade is on relatively firm ground here. Wade details a variety of studies based on tools like tandem DNA repeats and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that point to very distinctive genetic differences between populations dictating both physical and mental traits. For me the most striking evidence that something called race is real comes from the fact that when you ask computer algorithms to cluster genes based on differences and similarities in an unbiased manner, these statistical programs consistently settle on the five continental races - Caucasian, East Asian, African, Native American and African Aboriginal. Very few people would deny that there are clear genetic underpinnings behind traits like skin color or height among people on different continents, but Wade's achievement here is to clearly explain how it's not just one or two genes underlying such traits but a combination of genes - the effects of many of which are not obvious - that distinguish between races. The other point that he drives home is that even minor differences between gene frequencies can lead to significant observable differences because of additive effects. Wade also demolishes the beliefs of many leading thinkers who would rather have differences defined almost entirely by culture - these include Stephen Jay Gould who thought that humans evolved very little in the last ten thousand years (as Wade points out, about 14% of the genome has been under active selection since modern humans appeared on the scene), and Richard Lewontin who perpetuated a well-known belief that the dominance of intra as opposed to inter individual differences makes any discussion of race meaningless. As Wade demonstrates through citations of solid research and interviews with leading geneticists, this belief is simply erroneous since a variety of genetic clustering methods do seem to point to the existence of distinct races.

The last part of the book is likely to be regarded as more controversial because it deals mainly with cognitive, social and personality traits and is much more speculative. However Wade fully realizes this and also realizes that "there is nothing wrong with speculation, of course, as long as its premises are made clear", and this could be part of a scientist's credo. The crux of the matter is to ask why genes would also not account for mental and social differences between races if they do account for physical differences. The problem there is that although the hypothesis is valid, the evidence is slim for now. Some of the topics that Wade deals with in this third part are thus admittedly hazy in terms of evidence. For instance there is ample contemplation about whether a set of behavioral and genetic factors might have made the West progress faster than the East. However Wade also makes it clear that "progressive" does not mean "superior"; what he is rather doing is sifting through the evidence and asking if some of it might account for these more complex differences in social systems. Similarly, while there are pronounced racial differences in IQ, one must recognize the limitations of IQ, but more importantly should recognize that IQ says nothing about whether one human is "better" or "worse" than another; in fact the question is meaningless. Wade brings a similar approach to exploring genetic influences on cognitive abilities and personality traits; evidently, as he recognizes, the evidence on this topic is quite slim. He looks at the effects of genes on traits as diverse as language, reciprocity and propensity to dole out punishment. This discussion makes it clear that we are just getting started and there are many horizons that will be uncovered in the near future; for instance, tantalizing hints of links between genes for certain enzymes and aggressive or amiable behavior are just emerging. Some of the other paradigms Wade writes about, such as the high intelligence of Ashkenazi Jews, the gene-driven contrast between chimp and human societies and the rise of the West are interesting but have been covered by other authors like Steven Pinker, Greg Cochran and Gregory Clark. If I have a criticism of the book it is that in his efforts to cover extensive ground, Wade sometimes gives short shrift to research on interesting topics like oxytocin and hormonal influences. But what he does make clear is that the research opportunities in the field are definitely exciting, and scientists should not have to tiptoe around these topics for political reasons.

Overall I found this book extremely well-researched, thoughtfully written and objectively argued. The many researchers whose work Wade cites makes the writing authoritative; on the other hand, where speculation is warranted or noted he usually explicitly points it out as such. Some of these speculations such as the effects of genetics on the behavior of entire societies are quite far flung but I don't see any reason why, based on what we do know about the spread of genes among groups, they should be dismissed out of hand. At the very least they serve as reasonable hypotheses to be pondered, thrashed out and tested. Science is about ideas, not answers.

But the real lesson of the book should not be lost on us: A scientific topic cannot be declared off limits or whitewashed because its findings can be socially or politically incendiary; as Wade notes, "Whether or not a thesis might be politically incendiary should have no bearing on the estimate of its scientific validity." He gives nuclear physics as a good analogy; knowledge of the atom can lead to both destruction and advancement, but without this knowledge there will still be destruction. More importantly, one cannot hide the fruits of science; how they are used as instruments of social or political policy is a matter of principle and should be decoupled from the science itself. In fact, knowing the facts provides us with a clear basis for making progressive decisions and gives us a powerful weapon for defeating the nefarious goals of demagogues who would use pseudoscience to support their dubious claims. In that sense, I agree with Wade that even if genetic differences between races become enshrined into scientific fact, it does not mean at all that we will immediately descend into 19th-century racism; our moral compass has already decided the direction of that particular current.

Ultimately Wade's argument is about the transparency of knowledge. He admonishes some of the critics - especially some liberal academics and the American Anthropological Association - for espousing a "culture only" philosophy that is increasingly at odds with scientific facts and designed mainly for political correctness and a straitjacketed worldview. I don't think liberal academics are the only ones guilty of this attitude but some of them certainly embrace it. Liberal academics, however, have always prided themselves on being objective examiners of the scientific truth. Wade rightly says that they should join hands with all of us in bringing that same critical and honest attitude to examining the recent evidence about race and genetics. Whatever it reveals, we can be sure that as human beings we will try our best not to let it harm the cause of our fellow beings. We are, all of us, human beings first and scientists second."

jeudi 22 mai 2014

Vers la disparition des notes à l'école

Lisez bien ce compte rendu de l'émission de France Culture. Bientôt vous ne saurez plus que les instituteurs sont recrutés à quatre sur vingt. Les notes vont disparaître de telle sorte que c'est insupportable discrimination c'est la nourrice dans le néant de la médiocrité. C'est le progrès socialiste.

Economics and psychology

http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0n67x0st#page-7

La première femme ordonnée rabbin mourut à Auschwitz

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/what-s-on/art/rachel_weisz_lends_voice_to_father_s_film_about_world_s_first_female_rabbi_1_3611075

Criminalité personnes recherchées

http://www.avisderecherches.interieur.gouv.fr/personnes1.asp?T=R&P=3

Just keep in mind that I cannot be as a good physician on the phone!

http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/GeneralProfessionalIssues/45895?

Les hôpitaux publics facturent ce qu'ils veulent au patient...

Les disparités des tarifs journaliers appliqués sont incompréhensibles sur la base du service médical rendu ou des moyens engagés.
Les patients sont donc les variables d'ajustement du budget c'est à dire de la plus ou moins bonne gestion et de la plus ou moins grande activité.


http://www.leciss.org/sites/default/files/140522_DP_RacHospitalisation.pdf

http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-eco/2014/05/22/97002-20140522FILWWW00013-hopitaux-publics-ecart-de-1-a-6-des-tarifs.php

mercredi 21 mai 2014

Un choix de vie

Le manque est le choix malheureux du plaisir au lieu du bonheur.

Remember 9/11

http://www.911memorial.org/911-memorial-webcam

Awesome bikes and components

http://www.munich-composites.de/index.php/Home.html

http://www.munich-composites.de/index.php/products.html

Warning: Benzo and cardiac failure patients: 800% more CV events

Masahiko Setoguchi et al, Sleeping pills increase the risk of cardiovascular events in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction, Abstract P450  Heart Failure 2014


http://spo.escardio.org/SessionDetails.aspx?eevtid=68&sessId=13504&subSessId=3259&searchQuery=%2fdefault.aspx%3feevtid%3d68%26days%3d%26topics%3d%26types%3d%26rooms%3d%26freetext%3dMasahiko%2bSetoguchi%26sort%3d1%26page%3d1%26showResults%3dTrue%26nbPerPage%3d20%26scroll%3D0#.U3zjgrIaOL0

Is barefoot running dangerous?

http://www.marksdailyapple.com/vibram-fivefingers-lawsuit/#axzz32MhE30UO

How to fly more comfortably on economy class

http://www.designboom.com/design/idan-noyberg-gal-bulka-flight-comfort-b-tourist-strip-05-12-2014/


Railway safety

http://www.era.europa.eu/Document-Register/Documents/SPR%202013%20Final%20for%20web.pdf

PIB/hab

http://www.factamedia.com/le-pib-par-habitant-dans-lunion-europeenne/

Open data in medicine

http://www.alltrials.net/2014/new-alltrials-video-make-clinical-trials-count/
 
Paperblog