Justice underlies the notion of security from intentional injury. Simply put, justice is what protects us from the encroachment of others and the government on our right to interact freely, to enjoy the fruits of our labor, including property. A society may rapidly disintegrate if individuals believe that others — be they private or government entities — are ready to hurt, injure or unreasonably constrain them.
https://www.newsday.com/opinion/coronavirus/policy-principles-economic-recovery-coronavirus-covid-19-1.45832919
A blog for humans in the universe, to understand what we know now and to imagine what we don't know. To bridge the gap between the real world, its image in our brain and the ideas generated by.
vendredi 19 juin 2020
mardi 16 juin 2020
The allies of deconstructionnists: new barbarians
From VS NP
Richard Rahn on the history of Barbarianism and the return of its defining characteristics.
I wonder if the people involved want a solution to police killings through training reform? The question applies to my earlier post on the successful political-reform movement takeover of the Minneapolis City Counsel, followed by no reform action and the murder of Floyd.
By Richard W. Rahn
Published June 16, 2020
NEW BARBARIANS DENY FREE SPEECH TO OTHERS AND DESTROY HISTORICAL ARTIFACTS
“Barbarians” are groups of people who engage in wanton destruction of civilized places and institutions. Barbarians are driven by a desire for others’ material goods, through theft (looting), and for power.
WashTimes NewBarbariansDenyFreeSpeechToOthersAndDestroyHistoricalArtifacts Jun15 2020
Barbarism has a history as long as civilization. The Roman Empire in later years was sacked by various barbarian tribes. In the 13th century, the Mongol Horde destroyed civilizations from Mongolia to the gates of Europe (Vienna) and much of China and Korea.
In recent times, the Nazis (national socialists) started their barbaric acts by mass book burnings in 1933 in an attempt to destroy ideas they did not like. This quickly led to the theft and destruction of property owned by the Jews and others, leading to mass killings.
The communist barbarians, beginning in Russia in 1917, engaged in an orgy of idea suppression, theft and murder — all in the name of creating the “New Soviet Man.” Millions of Ukrainian kulaks (small farmers and merchants) and others were deliberately starved to death, otherwise killed or put in gulags.
In China, Mao Zedong and his fellow communist barbarians seized power in 1949. In 1958, he launched the Great Leap Forward, which is estimated to have resulted in 30 million to 55 million deaths, primarily from the resulting famine. In 1966, he launched the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, which resulted not only in many more deaths but also the widespread destruction of historical and cultural artifacts.
After the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan, it undertook a reign of terror to consolidate power. As typical of barbarians, it sought to erase much of Afghan history, including the blowing up of monumental Buddhist sculptures in 2001, which were completed between the third and sixth centuries. The whole world reacted with outrage to the barbaric act.
The new barbarians are acting true to form. They begin by trying to deny the free speech rights of others — by establishing speech codes and “approved” speech. Then they destroy historical artifacts, including statues and monuments, and engage in the theft and destruction of the property of others.
This is usually followed by the denial of freedom of movement and assembly, and restriction, or even seizure, of weapons of self-defense, all in the name of public safety. Finally, there is the arrest and incarceration of those who violate the new restrictions and speech codes, including the dissemination of “harmful ideas,” and assembly without permission, including attending religious services, etc.
The new barbarians include the street thugs, who often hijack legitimate peaceful demonstrations, and then engage directly in the destructive acts, but in fact are controlled by ideologues and their financial supporters — who then, like Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Mullah Omar, stay away from the front lines where they might be injured.
The behind-the-scenes barbarians include: self-described intellectuals, most often college professors — who, in past times, were instrumental in the creation and dissemination of knowledge, but have often morphed into destroyers of knowledge; members of the media, who both lack historical knowledge and are not smart enough to think beyond stage I, and who only report what they want to see, rather than what is. Also included are executives of media companies who have lost their ethical compass and only see the short-run ratings increases (and profits) that come from covering and encouraging violence and chaos; and finally, members of the political class who have been unable to acquire total power through the ballot box and have now resorted to trying to seize power by any means.
If you, as I have, read much of the history of totalitarian movements, traveled to places where the totalitarians gained control, and talked to people who have experienced it directly or are the sons and daughters of those who have suffered, you know my comments are not an overstatement. The new barbarians, despite their very limited knowledge of history, are smart enough to know that they must repress and stop free speech.
In recent weeks, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN and others have become increasingly explicit about not allowing contrary opinions on their pages or airwaves. Petitions are demanding that editors and contributors to academic and other publications, who have different views from the new barbarians, be fired. Twitter, Google and other “new media” are engaged in active censorship of views contrary to those held (some out of political expediency) by the heads of the companies.
Many of the new barbarians are so ignorant of history, they fail to understand that slavery, serfdom and assorted cruelties were the norm of mankind until the last couple of centuries. (In fact, a couple of African countries only made slavery illegal in recent years.)
If today’s standards were applied to all of those depicted in the world’s historical monuments, most would need to be destroyed. This includes the one to President Franklin Roosevelt in Washington, D.C., who put 120,000 innocent Japanese-Americans in concentration camps in 1942 because they had the “wrong” ancestry.
Students are no longer taught about the Scottish Enlightenment and its leaders, like David Hume and Adam Smith, whose ideas so influenced the American Founders. Many of the statues and monuments, from at least the time of ancient Greece, were erected to honor — and remind future generations — the contributions that those so depicted made to human knowledge and the advancement of civilization. Their destruction will only add to ignorance, not understanding.
Richard W. Rahn is chairman of the Institute for Global Economic Growth and Improbable Success Productions
Richard Rahn "New Barbarians Deny Free Speech to Others and Destroy Historical Artifacts" The Washington Times
© Copyright 2020 The Washington Times, LLC.
©2020 Institute for Global Economic Growth | Institute for Global Economic Growth
Richard Rahn on the history of Barbarianism and the return of its defining characteristics.
I wonder if the people involved want a solution to police killings through training reform? The question applies to my earlier post on the successful political-reform movement takeover of the Minneapolis City Counsel, followed by no reform action and the murder of Floyd.
By Richard W. Rahn
Published June 16, 2020
NEW BARBARIANS DENY FREE SPEECH TO OTHERS AND DESTROY HISTORICAL ARTIFACTS
“Barbarians” are groups of people who engage in wanton destruction of civilized places and institutions. Barbarians are driven by a desire for others’ material goods, through theft (looting), and for power.
WashTimes NewBarbariansDenyFreeSpeechToOthersAndDestroyHistoricalArtifacts Jun15 2020
Barbarism has a history as long as civilization. The Roman Empire in later years was sacked by various barbarian tribes. In the 13th century, the Mongol Horde destroyed civilizations from Mongolia to the gates of Europe (Vienna) and much of China and Korea.
In recent times, the Nazis (national socialists) started their barbaric acts by mass book burnings in 1933 in an attempt to destroy ideas they did not like. This quickly led to the theft and destruction of property owned by the Jews and others, leading to mass killings.
The communist barbarians, beginning in Russia in 1917, engaged in an orgy of idea suppression, theft and murder — all in the name of creating the “New Soviet Man.” Millions of Ukrainian kulaks (small farmers and merchants) and others were deliberately starved to death, otherwise killed or put in gulags.
In China, Mao Zedong and his fellow communist barbarians seized power in 1949. In 1958, he launched the Great Leap Forward, which is estimated to have resulted in 30 million to 55 million deaths, primarily from the resulting famine. In 1966, he launched the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, which resulted not only in many more deaths but also the widespread destruction of historical and cultural artifacts.
After the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan, it undertook a reign of terror to consolidate power. As typical of barbarians, it sought to erase much of Afghan history, including the blowing up of monumental Buddhist sculptures in 2001, which were completed between the third and sixth centuries. The whole world reacted with outrage to the barbaric act.
The new barbarians are acting true to form. They begin by trying to deny the free speech rights of others — by establishing speech codes and “approved” speech. Then they destroy historical artifacts, including statues and monuments, and engage in the theft and destruction of the property of others.
This is usually followed by the denial of freedom of movement and assembly, and restriction, or even seizure, of weapons of self-defense, all in the name of public safety. Finally, there is the arrest and incarceration of those who violate the new restrictions and speech codes, including the dissemination of “harmful ideas,” and assembly without permission, including attending religious services, etc.
The new barbarians include the street thugs, who often hijack legitimate peaceful demonstrations, and then engage directly in the destructive acts, but in fact are controlled by ideologues and their financial supporters — who then, like Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Mullah Omar, stay away from the front lines where they might be injured.
The behind-the-scenes barbarians include: self-described intellectuals, most often college professors — who, in past times, were instrumental in the creation and dissemination of knowledge, but have often morphed into destroyers of knowledge; members of the media, who both lack historical knowledge and are not smart enough to think beyond stage I, and who only report what they want to see, rather than what is. Also included are executives of media companies who have lost their ethical compass and only see the short-run ratings increases (and profits) that come from covering and encouraging violence and chaos; and finally, members of the political class who have been unable to acquire total power through the ballot box and have now resorted to trying to seize power by any means.
If you, as I have, read much of the history of totalitarian movements, traveled to places where the totalitarians gained control, and talked to people who have experienced it directly or are the sons and daughters of those who have suffered, you know my comments are not an overstatement. The new barbarians, despite their very limited knowledge of history, are smart enough to know that they must repress and stop free speech.
In recent weeks, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN and others have become increasingly explicit about not allowing contrary opinions on their pages or airwaves. Petitions are demanding that editors and contributors to academic and other publications, who have different views from the new barbarians, be fired. Twitter, Google and other “new media” are engaged in active censorship of views contrary to those held (some out of political expediency) by the heads of the companies.
Many of the new barbarians are so ignorant of history, they fail to understand that slavery, serfdom and assorted cruelties were the norm of mankind until the last couple of centuries. (In fact, a couple of African countries only made slavery illegal in recent years.)
If today’s standards were applied to all of those depicted in the world’s historical monuments, most would need to be destroyed. This includes the one to President Franklin Roosevelt in Washington, D.C., who put 120,000 innocent Japanese-Americans in concentration camps in 1942 because they had the “wrong” ancestry.
Students are no longer taught about the Scottish Enlightenment and its leaders, like David Hume and Adam Smith, whose ideas so influenced the American Founders. Many of the statues and monuments, from at least the time of ancient Greece, were erected to honor — and remind future generations — the contributions that those so depicted made to human knowledge and the advancement of civilization. Their destruction will only add to ignorance, not understanding.
Richard W. Rahn is chairman of the Institute for Global Economic Growth and Improbable Success Productions
Richard Rahn "New Barbarians Deny Free Speech to Others and Destroy Historical Artifacts" The Washington Times
© Copyright 2020 The Washington Times, LLC.
©2020 Institute for Global Economic Growth | Institute for Global Economic Growth
lundi 15 juin 2020
Chloroquine
Some will continue to use it. Some will use strawberries blended with shiitake mushrooms.
Others will use chloroquine dilutions 20 CH with undiluted Zinc
And so on
Others will use chloroquine dilutions 20 CH with undiluted Zinc
And so on
Mathieu Laine s'enthousiasme pour BHL à contre vérité, à contre temps et finalement dans un égotisme cynique.
"pour observer en philosophe et en homme libre la pandémie de peur et de renoncements qui nous a tous saisis. Le drame, au fond, aurait été de fermer cette parenthèse sans s'interroger pleinement, profondément et maintenant sur nous-mêmes et sur ce qui s'est joué, avec notre sidérante complicité."
Vraiment?
Dans les EHPAD et autres maisons de retraite?
Vraiment?
Dans les EHPAD et autres maisons de retraite?
30 000 morts
"Cette bascule bien trop aisée dans la servitude volontaire, dans le gouvernement de la Vie et dans une tyrannie détaillée, régulière, prévoyante et douce comme le tissu d'une blouse blanche, révèle en creux notre plus profond péril : le préoccupant recul du goût de la liberté."
"La tentation hygiéniste qui couve de longue date au feu glacé du précautionnisme, cette idéologie nouvelle brandie comme une machette par les Khmers blancs du risque zéro, a surgi comme un tigre, blanc lui aussi, des vieux tiroirs vichystes. La grande nurserie a trop facilement étendu son territoire pour ne pas sonner l'alerte."
Et voilà le cynisme revenu de l'immunité grégaire en fermant les yeux.
Une immense bêtise une incroyable irresponsabilité un fantastique égoisme un cynisme brutal de privilégié de classe
"Bernard-Henri Lévy tire comme au ball-trap les illusions mentales et toutes ces tentatives de manipulation souvraino-marxistes d'une opinion à fleur de peau." Là on est dans le délire à la Raoult.
Ah mais voilà le leit motiv qui tient lieu d'ADN à cette pensée réductionniste médiocre et autocentrée: les frontières: une obsession.
Au lieu de convoquer encore une fois Foucault et d'autres BHL aurait simplement pu commencer et achever son livre avec une citation de la Genèse. Exode.
https://www.lesechos.fr/idees-debats/livres/bhl-ce-livre-qui-reveille-les-consciences-1210620
"Cette bascule bien trop aisée dans la servitude volontaire, dans le gouvernement de la Vie et dans une tyrannie détaillée, régulière, prévoyante et douce comme le tissu d'une blouse blanche, révèle en creux notre plus profond péril : le préoccupant recul du goût de la liberté."
c'est écrit avec précision mais c'est faux profondément faux car la forme ne garantit pas le fond encore moins aujourd'hui que jadis.
"La tentation hygiéniste qui couve de longue date au feu glacé du précautionnisme, cette idéologie nouvelle brandie comme une machette par les Khmers blancs du risque zéro, a surgi comme un tigre, blanc lui aussi, des vieux tiroirs vichystes. La grande nurserie a trop facilement étendu son territoire pour ne pas sonner l'alerte."
Et voilà le cynisme revenu de l'immunité grégaire en fermant les yeux.
Une immense bêtise une incroyable irresponsabilité un fantastique égoisme un cynisme brutal de privilégié de classe
"Bernard-Henri Lévy tire comme au ball-trap les illusions mentales et toutes ces tentatives de manipulation souvraino-marxistes d'une opinion à fleur de peau." Là on est dans le délire à la Raoult.
Ah mais voilà le leit motiv qui tient lieu d'ADN à cette pensée réductionniste médiocre et autocentrée: les frontières: une obsession.
Au lieu de convoquer encore une fois Foucault et d'autres BHL aurait simplement pu commencer et achever son livre avec une citation de la Genèse. Exode.
https://www.lesechos.fr/idees-debats/livres/bhl-ce-livre-qui-reveille-les-consciences-1210620