Cyrulnik’s perceptions about creativity and orphanhood have only a small probability to be scientific facts

https://www.franceinter.fr/emissions/l-invite-d-ali-baddou/l-invite-d-ali-baddou-12-avril-2019?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2gDZyb_5EcARfM3L0MXBUnvXUKDZBoyIOIXSrWCPbjn6TUtCkb1ofQoyw#Echobox=1555075990

We cannot find any evidence of that and even any paper on the subject from Cyrulnik. So instead of propagating confusing assumptions Cyrulnik should better do the math and write a paper which will be peer-reviewed.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23063328

In fact, this "intuition" is rather a clinical case of delusional psycho-analytic arrogance.

"C'est l'image de la mère qui les invite à la création."

Martin Eisenstadt
http://www.haynal.org/docs/Childhood%20Lost%20and%20Recovered.pdf


http://www.sirbey.com/fr/les-orphelins-menent-ils-le-monde/


https://www.placedeslibraires.fr/ebook/9782706281792-les-orphelins-menent-ils-le-monde-pierre-de-senarclens-andre-haynal-pierre-rentchnick/#

The most rational approach to this issue is to recognize that a lot of orphans do have problems with violence. The myth of resilience is over.